Should the government regulate the internet

Some estimate that cable broadband providers enjoy gross margins as high as 95 percent, an exceptionally high rate of revenue relative to the supposed costs associated with offering the service.

Delivered twice a week, straight to your inbox. Get a free 10 week email series that will teach you how to start investing. In fact, the only real solution to the data consumption problem would be to just increase capacity.

That means more people will have information relating to your finances. Regulating the Internet would keep a check on such activity, narrowing it down quite immensely with stiffer laws.

The long term government goal in creating ICANN—which is made up of governments around the globe, corporations and individual Internet users—was to eventually give the multinational organization full ownership of domain name systems. And once enacted under the cover of night, such regulations are not easy to untangle.

Who Controls The Internet? US Government Hands Over Control To ICANN

The Securities and Exchange Commission has imposed strict regulations on initial public offerings of corporate stock, on the full disclosure requirements of a stock prospectus, and on the buying and selling of equities on the various stock exchanges under its oversight.

To learn more about our methodology, click here.

U.S. Government Should Not Regulate the Internet.&nbspTerm Paper

The web allows entrepreneurs to fill any one of an endless array of niches, which stimulates economic activity. The food we eat, the cars we drive, and now the Internet we surf are all subject to regulations by unelected bureaucrats. So clearly the "no rules" approach has a cost for the general public - which is why our elected bodies are in charge of regulation in the first place.

Even worse, investment in expanding the Internet will be chilled, as FCC control of network management makes investment less inviting. It seems more and more likely that cloud computing will be an important part of how people do business. The most controversial instance was when the story broke about how people who had an iPad or Android device were essentially being followed, using the GPS inside the equipment.

That is true under the current contract with the US Government and will remain true without the contract with the US Government. They've violated immigration laws by hiring undocumented workers. An already-disillusioned populace can very quickly become mutinous when their ability to interact with the outside world is taken away.

Cyberpatrol is one of these programs. Or do you think another solution is possible? Facebook, Google, and Twitter, all put out new ways for people to share information, while at Should the government regulate the internet same time they track the way people are using them.

Technology companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft have invested millions of dollars into lobbying Congress to make sure their companies are not regulated and are able to build products without having to deal with any red tape.

But there are real reasons why the internet needs to be regulated in order to ensure the millions of people who use it for their personal and business lives are protected.

Noteworthy among them is the Small Business Administrationwhich, among its other pro-business services, arranges for loans for start-up companies. Paired with the amount of money that would have to be spent on creating filters and sifting through the almost infinite amount of information available would be staggering.

But what if, for example, a cure for the common cold is created by a pharmaceutical company using Google documents? Let us know in the comments. Should ISPs start building out their networks to address network congestion? The Internet is a new medium that can be compared to many existing modes of communication like books, newspaper, radio, and television, but is ultimately different from all of these modes in the sense that it embodies new interactive technology that poses the problem of regulation of what is said and what can be accessed, and by whom.

For these companies, selling broadband packages even to the heaviest users is still quite profitable. Yet, a review of the publicly available financial document for some of the largest ISPs in the country shows a decline in capital expenditures—the costs associated with building, upgrading and maintaining a network, such as construction, repairs, and equipment purchases—for their wireline networks.

We know no law is perfect, but there are common sense regulations that can be implemented that will make life easier for individuals and companies alike. Technology companies are making it easier to use a card or online banking wherever you go. Patent and trademark violations are punishable by heavy fines and subject to civil actions that can be costly if the defendant loses the infringement case.

The examples above of what seems like government versus business are only a few of the literally thousands of such conflicts that have occurred over the decades. We can never say what tomorrow will bring when it comes to Internet regulation. Using these in ways that aren't acceptable is what puts officials on edge, forcing them to come up with policies and acts that are bound to create a frenzy.

Since then, in an ever-increasing blizzard of regulations and a huge, complex tax codeAmerican business has both prospered and suffered as a consequence of government action - collaborative and complementary, restrictive and adversarial.

If it's in the news, it's in our polls. It would suppress people from being communicative and expressive, changing the way information is dealt with over the Internet. If big business could speak with one mouth, it would likely say that regulations hold it back and cost everyone in the long run.

Speed and access would increase around the country while innovation, and jobs, would flock to the Internet like never before.Mar 14,  · If you haven't been following along, Net neutrality is the idea that all traffic on the Internet should be treated equally.

That means your broadband provider, which controls your access to. Here are ten of the reasons why governments should not regulate the internet.

Oxford Internet Institute

To Protect the First Amendment – One of the most cherished rights granted to Americans, the right to free speech and freedom of the press, is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. These are only a few of the reasons why the government should not attempt to censor or filter the internet; like the proverbial iceberg, the bulk of the argument lies beneath the surface of what the average citizen sees.

Internet regulation has become an increasingly controversial topic as governments have sought to deal with issues arising from the growing centrality of the Internet and the perceived risks to children and other important segments of the public.

While users are subject to existing laws and. Jun 11,  · Best Answer: I think the tools in place for parent to self-regulate the internet should be put into play more. the biggest problem I see aren't websites, but rather instant messaging technologies that are much harder to track and the source of alot of Resolved.

Jan 12,  · Re: Should The Government Regulate The Internet? Paul is wrong. The Internet reaches across state lines, therefore is a federal matter and also if not regulated, people could commit crimes on it and go unpunished.

Should the government regulate the internet
Rated 5/5 based on 50 review